Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 03:27

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Billie Eilish Kisses Nat Wolff in Italy amid Romance Rumors - AOL.com
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How were cows used in ancient India?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why We Still Can't Find A Solar System Twin - IFLScience
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
As Kamala Harris weighs a run for governor, some Democrats are moving on - The Washington Post
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Air India plane crash: Investigation underway, black boxes found - ABC News
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
CM Punk comes out as the Doctor of Thuganomics and is cheered in Saudi Arabia - Cageside Seats
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
FBC: Firebreak Gets Update 1.2 as Remedy Promises Lots More Fixes - Wccftech
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Meta pauses mobile port tracking tech on Android after researchers cry foul - theregister.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.